1 00:00:00,790 --> 00:00:07,320 [Music] 2 00:00:13,589 --> 00:00:09,079 [Applause] 3 00:00:15,869 --> 00:00:13,599 so I've truncated my title down to wet 4 00:00:18,650 --> 00:00:15,879 dry environmental cycles and alternative 5 00:00:22,740 --> 00:00:18,660 building blocks in prebiotic chemistry 6 00:00:24,779 --> 00:00:22,750 and as Bruce said I'm going to talk 7 00:00:26,820 --> 00:00:24,789 about some of the successes we've had in 8 00:00:29,269 --> 00:00:26,830 the Center for chemical evolution I'm 9 00:00:31,499 --> 00:00:29,279 also going to start out with some of our 10 00:00:34,350 --> 00:00:31,509 guiding principles or if you will 11 00:00:36,780 --> 00:00:34,360 truisms and hypotheses that have been 12 00:00:38,430 --> 00:00:36,790 guiding our research you can decide 13 00:00:40,950 --> 00:00:38,440 whether you think something is true or 14 00:00:45,210 --> 00:00:40,960 it's a hypothesis or how quite 15 00:00:47,630 --> 00:00:45,220 questionable I'll say that we follow the 16 00:00:49,950 --> 00:00:47,640 principle life is based on polymers that 17 00:00:52,590 --> 00:00:49,960 the emergence of biopolymers was 18 00:00:55,890 --> 00:00:52,600 essential to the origins of life and 19 00:00:58,429 --> 00:00:55,900 that the synthesis that the first 20 00:01:01,679 --> 00:00:58,439 syntheses of biopolymers was a result of 21 00:01:03,420 --> 00:01:01,689 geophysical geochemical cycles and what 22 00:01:07,530 --> 00:01:03,430 I'd like to just say special organic 23 00:01:12,450 --> 00:01:07,540 molecules specialized in special 24 00:01:14,130 --> 00:01:12,460 properties not necessarily rare and I'll 25 00:01:15,720 --> 00:01:14,140 continue and say that the molecules and 26 00:01:18,810 --> 00:01:15,730 reactions that gave rise to the first 27 00:01:23,010 --> 00:01:18,820 power polymers were simple maybe special 28 00:01:25,649 --> 00:01:23,020 but simple and robust and I'll go on to 29 00:01:29,910 --> 00:01:25,659 say that this is a principle that's been 30 00:01:33,180 --> 00:01:29,920 guiding us for over a decade and we say 31 00:01:34,710 --> 00:01:33,190 that if an experiment the mall model for 32 00:01:39,540 --> 00:01:34,720 a particular step in the origin of life 33 00:01:41,880 --> 00:01:39,550 is correct then we think that the model 34 00:01:43,860 --> 00:01:41,890 should solve more problems than just the 35 00:01:46,140 --> 00:01:43,870 problem that the model is designed to 36 00:01:49,170 --> 00:01:46,150 solve in the very least it should not 37 00:01:50,640 --> 00:01:49,180 generate more but ideally if you're on 38 00:01:53,940 --> 00:01:50,650 the right track it should solve more 39 00:01:55,740 --> 00:01:53,950 problems than you know and if that's 40 00:02:00,289 --> 00:01:55,750 true then you should discover what we 41 00:02:02,160 --> 00:02:00,299 call bonus solutions so I'll start with 42 00:02:05,399 --> 00:02:02,170 inspiration on the design of our 43 00:02:07,469 --> 00:02:05,409 experiments and that's extant 44 00:02:10,740 --> 00:02:07,479 biopolymers then all of these are 45 00:02:13,259 --> 00:02:10,750 synthesized by what are called 46 00:02:15,180 --> 00:02:13,269 condensation bonds such as two amino 47 00:02:17,250 --> 00:02:15,190 acids linked together give off water and 48 00:02:18,130 --> 00:02:17,260 the formation of condensation bond you 49 00:02:20,290 --> 00:02:18,140 keep doing that 50 00:02:22,449 --> 00:02:20,300 you know acids each time a water comes 51 00:02:24,880 --> 00:02:22,459 off to make a polypeptide same thing 52 00:02:29,590 --> 00:02:24,890 with polysaccharides nucleic acids and 53 00:02:31,540 --> 00:02:29,600 lipids those type of bonds present what 54 00:02:33,670 --> 00:02:31,550 is the first problem that we had to 55 00:02:36,930 --> 00:02:33,680 address which is the best place to form 56 00:02:39,550 --> 00:02:36,940 condensation ponds is in a hot dry 57 00:02:41,140 --> 00:02:39,560 environment because if you want to drive 58 00:02:43,690 --> 00:02:41,150 this reaction to the right you want to 59 00:02:45,100 --> 00:02:43,700 get rid of water so a surface arid 60 00:02:47,170 --> 00:02:45,110 surface is the best place but 61 00:02:49,000 --> 00:02:47,180 biopolymers they followed they function 62 00:02:53,590 --> 00:02:49,010 and they evolved in water you know 63 00:02:55,240 --> 00:02:53,600 that's a principle of them so we look 64 00:02:56,949 --> 00:02:55,250 for simple solutions that's what we've 65 00:02:59,140 --> 00:02:56,959 been focused on a simple solution to 66 00:03:00,940 --> 00:02:59,150 this is that the polymers of life were 67 00:03:05,020 --> 00:03:00,950 originally formed on the surface of the 68 00:03:06,940 --> 00:03:05,030 earth as a result of wet/dry cycles this 69 00:03:09,610 --> 00:03:06,950 is not a new idea we think that it's 70 00:03:12,040 --> 00:03:09,620 though parsimoniously the most obvious 71 00:03:14,350 --> 00:03:12,050 solution to it fits really well with the 72 00:03:17,890 --> 00:03:14,360 chemistry of the polymers with possible 73 00:03:19,990 --> 00:03:17,900 environments on the earth however early 74 00:03:22,780 --> 00:03:20,000 on we ran into another problem with this 75 00:03:24,850 --> 00:03:22,790 which is that this idea again is not new 76 00:03:26,770 --> 00:03:24,860 and attempts to make polypeptides by 77 00:03:29,860 --> 00:03:26,780 simply drying and heating amino acids 78 00:03:31,979 --> 00:03:29,870 have not provided satisfactory results 79 00:03:34,960 --> 00:03:31,989 we know that some of the earliest 80 00:03:38,050 --> 00:03:34,970 attempts to make vial polymers were from 81 00:03:40,360 --> 00:03:38,060 Sidney Fox and his collaborators and 82 00:03:42,280 --> 00:03:40,370 back in the 50s they had a results are 83 00:03:44,830 --> 00:03:42,290 pretty high temperatures that resulted 84 00:03:47,470 --> 00:03:44,840 in non peptide products there's been 85 00:03:50,920 --> 00:03:47,480 some nice advances in that area again 86 00:03:53,800 --> 00:03:50,930 but we've got some issues still Lahav 87 00:03:56,560 --> 00:03:53,810 Road and others have looked to do this 88 00:03:59,080 --> 00:03:56,570 under lower temperatures where you don't 89 00:04:00,940 --> 00:03:59,090 get those side products they typically 90 00:04:02,740 --> 00:04:00,950 get pretty low yields about one to two 91 00:04:03,670 --> 00:04:02,750 percent of just dipeptides or 92 00:04:06,610 --> 00:04:03,680 tripeptides 93 00:04:09,009 --> 00:04:06,620 so a possible solution to this problem 94 00:04:12,100 --> 00:04:09,019 is that polypeptides are preceded by 95 00:04:13,660 --> 00:04:12,110 what we'll call proto polypeptides with 96 00:04:16,449 --> 00:04:13,670 structures chemical linkages that are 97 00:04:18,550 --> 00:04:16,459 similar but distinct okay and that's 98 00:04:19,779 --> 00:04:18,560 important just change one atom and it 99 00:04:21,880 --> 00:04:19,789 can totally change the chemical 100 00:04:23,740 --> 00:04:21,890 properties of a molecule so they were 101 00:04:26,529 --> 00:04:23,750 similar but distinct from polypeptides 102 00:04:29,290 --> 00:04:26,539 so an obvious one would be that 103 00:04:31,670 --> 00:04:29,300 polypeptides were preceded by polyesters 104 00:04:33,890 --> 00:04:31,680 again not in not a original 105 00:04:37,939 --> 00:04:33,900 my idea the ester linkage was proposed 106 00:04:40,820 --> 00:04:37,949 back at least 1971 by rich and and then 107 00:04:44,110 --> 00:04:40,830 later or Gail discussed it and we liked 108 00:04:46,730 --> 00:04:44,120 this idea a lot because amino acids have 109 00:04:48,529 --> 00:04:46,740 hydroxy acids as analogues just change 110 00:04:50,659 --> 00:04:48,539 the amino group to hydroxyl group there 111 00:04:52,100 --> 00:04:50,669 and hydroxy acids they're used in life 112 00:04:54,290 --> 00:04:52,110 today they're produced in milli your 113 00:04:57,529 --> 00:04:54,300 experiments are found in meteorites so 114 00:04:59,150 --> 00:04:57,539 it looked like a real possibility that 115 00:05:02,150 --> 00:04:59,160 life would have started with polyesters 116 00:05:05,810 --> 00:05:02,160 so that's a simple solution and what we 117 00:05:08,029 --> 00:05:05,820 did find is that if we dry down these 118 00:05:10,790 --> 00:05:08,039 hydroxy acids what we do make ester 119 00:05:14,659 --> 00:05:10,800 linked oligomers just shown here as a 120 00:05:18,110 --> 00:05:14,669 lactic acid dimer but this is the first 121 00:05:20,839 --> 00:05:18,120 bonus that we found in pursuing this is 122 00:05:23,960 --> 00:05:20,849 that hydroxy acids catalyze peptide bond 123 00:05:26,210 --> 00:05:23,970 formation and what we found is that if 124 00:05:31,100 --> 00:05:26,220 we mix them you know acids in with the 125 00:05:33,080 --> 00:05:31,110 products of hydroxy acid condensation or 126 00:05:35,870 --> 00:05:33,090 even just start at the beginning and mix 127 00:05:37,850 --> 00:05:35,880 them all together that we have a mean 128 00:05:40,850 --> 00:05:37,860 ester exchange that leads to peptide 129 00:05:43,100 --> 00:05:40,860 bond formation so that to us was was a 130 00:05:45,469 --> 00:05:43,110 big bonus and so we thought the idea of 131 00:05:49,189 --> 00:05:45,479 using hydroxy acid looks like a really 132 00:05:50,710 --> 00:05:49,199 good route to polypeptides now there 133 00:05:53,600 --> 00:05:50,720 were some other bonuses that came out 134 00:05:56,270 --> 00:05:53,610 what we found is that if you look in the 135 00:05:57,860 --> 00:05:56,280 literature there was quite a bias on 136 00:05:59,719 --> 00:05:57,870 just drawing down the amino acids on 137 00:06:02,450 --> 00:05:59,729 what the composition is what sequences 138 00:06:06,230 --> 00:06:02,460 were favored and what we found from the 139 00:06:08,149 --> 00:06:06,240 start just mixing glycine and alanine 140 00:06:11,180 --> 00:06:08,159 that we were able to get all the 141 00:06:12,980 --> 00:06:11,190 sequences that were possible this is our 142 00:06:15,529 --> 00:06:12,990 initial results where we're just doing 143 00:06:19,189 --> 00:06:15,539 alanine and glycine and just looking at 144 00:06:21,529 --> 00:06:19,199 these Penta Murs here we're just based 145 00:06:25,040 --> 00:06:21,539 upon the molecular weight they have two 146 00:06:26,719 --> 00:06:25,050 lactic acids in and through one alanine 147 00:06:29,749 --> 00:06:26,729 and one and two glycines that we see 148 00:06:32,240 --> 00:06:29,759 that we got all possible sequences we 149 00:06:34,909 --> 00:06:32,250 took this further where we did mixtures 150 00:06:37,730 --> 00:06:34,919 with more amino acids and more hydroxy 151 00:06:40,159 --> 00:06:37,740 acids and what we found is that the 152 00:06:43,439 --> 00:06:40,169 sequence space that we generated is 153 00:06:45,480 --> 00:06:43,449 enormous in fact we we had to develop 154 00:06:48,059 --> 00:06:45,490 new methods that's what's illustrated 155 00:06:50,730 --> 00:06:48,069 here by these 3d plots actually even in 156 00:06:52,619 --> 00:06:50,740 a four dimensional plot to show the 157 00:06:55,920 --> 00:06:52,629 diversity of products that that were 158 00:06:59,549 --> 00:06:55,930 generating so it's again a big bonus 159 00:07:01,499 --> 00:06:59,559 beyond what we had expected there and 160 00:07:04,110 --> 00:07:01,509 I'm going to add one very recent bonus 161 00:07:08,070 --> 00:07:04,120 that's gonna come out very soon which is 162 00:07:09,929 --> 00:07:08,080 that drying these mixtures where we look 163 00:07:12,510 --> 00:07:09,939 at the difference between the 164 00:07:14,399 --> 00:07:12,520 proteinaceous amino acids and non 165 00:07:16,709 --> 00:07:14,409 protease that is those that are found in 166 00:07:18,929 --> 00:07:16,719 the coding of proteins versus those that 167 00:07:21,839 --> 00:07:18,939 are not there seems to be a preference 168 00:07:23,879 --> 00:07:21,849 here for the incorporation at least in 169 00:07:26,519 --> 00:07:23,889 the cationic amino acids for the 170 00:07:30,439 --> 00:07:26,529 proteinaceous woods which may be telling 171 00:07:33,329 --> 00:07:30,449 us something about why and how early 172 00:07:37,200 --> 00:07:33,339 lysine and arginine were selected into 173 00:07:39,779 --> 00:07:37,210 polypeptides so this study here was 174 00:07:41,519 --> 00:07:39,789 headed up by Moran Pinter and Lou 175 00:07:43,739 --> 00:07:41,529 Clayman and Lauren Williams really 176 00:07:45,869 --> 00:07:43,749 acting as the main PI's on this project 177 00:07:48,029 --> 00:07:45,879 and as I said this is coming out very 178 00:07:50,399 --> 00:07:48,039 soon just accepted yesterday and if you 179 00:07:53,760 --> 00:07:50,409 want to hear it talk on this Moran is 180 00:07:57,409 --> 00:07:53,770 giving a talk tomorrow on this so 181 00:08:01,469 --> 00:07:57,419 there's a similar story when it comes to 182 00:08:04,019 --> 00:08:01,479 nucleic acids and I will hopefully admit 183 00:08:06,600 --> 00:08:04,029 nucleic acids are more complex than 184 00:08:09,600 --> 00:08:06,610 polypeptides we know you can make the 185 00:08:11,219 --> 00:08:09,610 building blocks of polypeptides amino 186 00:08:13,619 --> 00:08:11,229 acids and model prebiotic reactions 187 00:08:15,480 --> 00:08:13,629 there's a lot of challenges with sugars 188 00:08:17,429 --> 00:08:15,490 less with bases there's challenges 189 00:08:19,050 --> 00:08:17,439 phosphate but then these all have to be 190 00:08:21,029 --> 00:08:19,060 connected into nucleotides and they're 191 00:08:24,839 --> 00:08:21,039 polymerized so those are additional 192 00:08:27,179 --> 00:08:24,849 challenges so in the CC we've also been 193 00:08:29,519 --> 00:08:27,189 hypothesizing that RNA as a result of 194 00:08:31,829 --> 00:08:29,529 multiple evolutionary steps that the 195 00:08:33,870 --> 00:08:31,839 base sugar connecting molecules have all 196 00:08:36,329 --> 00:08:33,880 changed something that we wrote about in 197 00:08:39,420 --> 00:08:36,339 a paper we called my grandfather's axe a 198 00:08:41,370 --> 00:08:39,430 few years ago and again what are the 199 00:08:44,240 --> 00:08:41,380 problems that we have with nucleic acids 200 00:08:47,069 --> 00:08:44,250 well one of them is that in a simple 201 00:08:50,610 --> 00:08:47,079 model prebiotic reaction where the 202 00:08:53,309 --> 00:08:50,620 extant bases are dried with ribose they 203 00:08:56,040 --> 00:08:53,319 produce nucleosides in either low yield 204 00:08:56,999 --> 00:08:56,050 or in no yield so this has been a big 205 00:09:00,119 --> 00:08:57,009 problem 206 00:09:03,660 --> 00:09:00,129 in the field again a simple solution to 207 00:09:06,869 --> 00:09:03,670 this could be that the nucleobases that 208 00:09:09,569 --> 00:09:06,879 were in proto RNA an ancestor of RNA 209 00:09:11,819 --> 00:09:09,579 were different in this case we've looked 210 00:09:14,400 --> 00:09:11,829 at melamine I'm showing you here and 211 00:09:17,009 --> 00:09:14,410 barbecue rock acid you could see this is 212 00:09:19,199 --> 00:09:17,019 perhaps taking the place of adenine and 213 00:09:21,179 --> 00:09:19,209 this is taking the place of your cell we 214 00:09:24,479 --> 00:09:21,189 tested these molecules and simple dry 215 00:09:26,369 --> 00:09:24,489 down reactions melamine gives us 55 216 00:09:30,150 --> 00:09:26,379 percent yield of both the alpha and beta 217 00:09:33,329 --> 00:09:30,160 anomers of the nucleotides and Barbic 218 00:09:36,539 --> 00:09:33,339 tear gas that gives us 82 so these work 219 00:09:39,419 --> 00:09:36,549 really well we also get bonuses though 220 00:09:42,210 --> 00:09:39,429 these alternative nucleobases those that 221 00:09:45,449 --> 00:09:42,220 form glycosides very easily with rivals 222 00:09:47,970 --> 00:09:45,459 with ribose also form them with many 223 00:09:49,949 --> 00:09:47,980 different sugars basically every sugar 224 00:09:53,009 --> 00:09:49,959 that we tested except for some modified 225 00:09:56,340 --> 00:09:53,019 sugars are showing the formation of 226 00:09:58,289 --> 00:09:56,350 glycosides with our bases so this could 227 00:10:01,799 --> 00:09:58,299 relax the constraints on getting ribose 228 00:10:03,210 --> 00:10:01,809 first david fiallo and Tyler Roach are 229 00:10:05,039 --> 00:10:03,220 working on this so you can talk to them 230 00:10:06,600 --> 00:10:05,049 they're here at this meeting and Tyler 231 00:10:10,439 --> 00:10:06,610 is giving a talk tomorrow 232 00:10:11,340 --> 00:10:10,449 on this topic another bonus that we 233 00:10:14,159 --> 00:10:11,350 found is that these alternative 234 00:10:16,669 --> 00:10:14,169 nucleobases self-assemble in water as 235 00:10:20,220 --> 00:10:16,679 monomers the extant bases don't do that 236 00:10:23,309 --> 00:10:20,230 you could see here this is an AFM image 237 00:10:25,650 --> 00:10:23,319 of non-covalent assemblies yet another 238 00:10:28,350 --> 00:10:25,660 bonus that we found with this is that 239 00:10:31,559 --> 00:10:28,360 they have a very very strong propensity 240 00:10:35,369 --> 00:10:31,569 to adopt homo chiral domains 241 00:10:37,590 --> 00:10:35,379 dr. Shanice Caro and karna is here and 242 00:10:40,460 --> 00:10:37,600 he will be giving a poster tonight and a 243 00:10:44,090 --> 00:10:40,470 lightning talk on Friday about how these 244 00:10:47,789 --> 00:10:44,100 plausible prebiotic bases make these 245 00:10:50,189 --> 00:10:47,799 homo chiral domains which we are quite 246 00:10:52,949 --> 00:10:50,199 excited about yet another bonus is that 247 00:10:56,249 --> 00:10:52,959 if we take what we've learned from our 248 00:10:58,679 --> 00:10:56,259 polypeptide work and our nucleo base 249 00:11:00,779 --> 00:10:58,689 work our pro to nuclear base work we put 250 00:11:03,539 --> 00:11:00,789 them together and we can now see just 251 00:11:06,569 --> 00:11:03,549 what might be possible structures for 252 00:11:08,750 --> 00:11:06,579 proto RNA these are just theoretical but 253 00:11:10,700 --> 00:11:08,760 I think that these have a lot 254 00:11:12,940 --> 00:11:10,710 the attributes that we would look be 255 00:11:16,400 --> 00:11:12,950 looking for for a very simple system 256 00:11:18,320 --> 00:11:16,410 that could be composed out of plausible 257 00:11:21,080 --> 00:11:18,330 prebiotic building blocks they can 258 00:11:23,480 --> 00:11:21,090 polymerize and start to evolve and again 259 00:11:25,370 --> 00:11:23,490 David and Senesh are here and David will 260 00:11:28,730 --> 00:11:25,380 be giving a poster tonight and the 261 00:11:31,520 --> 00:11:28,740 Lightning talked about this system so 262 00:11:33,440 --> 00:11:31,530 these are not all of the collaborators 263 00:11:35,810 --> 00:11:33,450 in the CCE but I've tried to pick the 264 00:11:37,700 --> 00:11:35,820 ones that I've highlighted the work on 265 00:11:40,550 --> 00:11:37,710 you can see this is a huge team effort 266 00:11:43,100 --> 00:11:40,560 and I feel very fortunate to work with 267 00:11:45,200 --> 00:11:43,110 so many talented people and there's even 268 00:11:47,630 --> 00:11:45,210 more here's the at the last Center 269 00:11:49,880 --> 00:11:47,640 meeting here and so I've got to thank 270 00:11:52,640 --> 00:11:49,890 everyone in the CCE and members of my 271 00:11:56,030 --> 00:11:52,650 lab for contributing to these projects 272 00:12:00,650 --> 00:11:56,040 in such a wonderful insightful way and 273 00:12:09,760 --> 00:12:00,660 also to NSF and NASA Astrobiology for 274 00:12:17,270 --> 00:12:14,060 we have time for a couple of questions 275 00:12:19,400 --> 00:12:17,280 for Nick if if you'd like to line up we 276 00:12:21,020 --> 00:12:19,410 have one here hi I'm Mike Wong from the 277 00:12:23,330 --> 00:12:21,030 University of Washington I'm really 278 00:12:25,250 --> 00:12:23,340 intrigued by the idea that the original 279 00:12:27,080 --> 00:12:25,260 nucleobases could have been different 280 00:12:28,760 --> 00:12:27,090 from the ones that we see today and I 281 00:12:31,340 --> 00:12:28,770 was wondering if you've identified any 282 00:12:33,350 --> 00:12:31,350 plausible reasons why there was a switch 283 00:12:35,960 --> 00:12:33,360 from those original nucleobases that you 284 00:12:39,170 --> 00:12:35,970 suggests to the ones that that we find 285 00:12:41,210 --> 00:12:39,180 in RNA today so one of the principles 286 00:12:43,250 --> 00:12:41,220 we've also been operating on is with 287 00:12:46,640 --> 00:12:43,260 respect to the nucleobases we think that 288 00:12:48,830 --> 00:12:46,650 easy to form nucleosides also translates 289 00:12:50,750 --> 00:12:48,840 to easy to have them break apart and so 290 00:12:52,790 --> 00:12:50,760 that's where we see that the the extant 291 00:12:55,190 --> 00:12:52,800 ones are definitely more stable so one 292 00:12:57,770 --> 00:12:55,200 reason could be that a transition took 293 00:13:00,890 --> 00:12:57,780 place to make what is proto RNA one is 294 00:13:03,860 --> 00:13:00,900 becoming RNA a more stable molecule at 295 00:13:05,600 --> 00:13:03,870 the nucleo base level also there are 296 00:13:06,980 --> 00:13:05,610 some reasons if we draw them out that we 297 00:13:08,990 --> 00:13:06,990 could think about in terms of diversity 298 00:13:10,970 --> 00:13:09,000 of structures and baking and breaking 299 00:13:12,410 --> 00:13:10,980 symmetry between the base pairs and the 300 00:13:15,620 --> 00:13:12,420 minor groove for example that really 301 00:13:18,130 --> 00:13:15,630 point to the extant ones being superior 302 00:13:23,200 --> 00:13:18,140 to what we're looking at thank you 303 00:13:30,970 --> 00:13:27,600 can I ask you a question yeah okay this 304 00:13:33,070 --> 00:13:30,980 Steve banner sort of is arguing about 305 00:13:38,710 --> 00:13:33,080 the org that the origin of RNA is a 306 00:13:42,190 --> 00:13:38,720 solved problem and thinks that it was 307 00:13:55,390 --> 00:13:42,200 the first prebiotic polymer and I just 308 00:13:58,650 --> 00:13:55,400 wondering if you could comment I I'm 309 00:14:02,440 --> 00:13:58,660 gonna accept that that the problem is 310 00:14:05,590 --> 00:14:02,450 solved or a plausible prebiotic polymer 311 00:14:07,780 --> 00:14:05,600 when somebody can take ingredients that 312 00:14:09,430 --> 00:14:07,790 yeah you know I'd say at least a quarter 313 00:14:12,670 --> 00:14:09,440 of us in the room would say those are 314 00:14:14,860 --> 00:14:12,680 plausible building blocks and puts it 315 00:14:19,000 --> 00:14:14,870 through a very simple cycle such as 316 00:14:20,980 --> 00:14:19,010 hydration dehydration cycles and we can 317 00:14:23,620 --> 00:14:20,990 do an analysis and we've got oligomers 318 00:14:27,100 --> 00:14:23,630 that are long enough to fold up and 319 00:14:29,710 --> 00:14:27,110 maybe show some signs of rudimentary 320 00:14:32,350 --> 00:14:29,720 evolution when that's done then I'll say 321 00:14:34,780 --> 00:14:32,360 okay I can accept that what I said 322 00:14:38,020 --> 00:14:34,790 Lauren was that several of the key 323 00:14:41,650 --> 00:14:38,030 paradoxes that made it appear as if the 324 00:14:44,290 --> 00:14:41,660 RNA world model was impossible have been 325 00:14:45,640 --> 00:14:44,300 resolved what I have now done and I 326 00:14:47,470 --> 00:14:45,650 mentioned this a couple of minutes ago 327 00:14:49,420 --> 00:14:47,480 is that there are now when you solve a 328 00:14:52,300 --> 00:14:49,430 certain set of these paradoxes you 329 00:14:55,620 --> 00:14:52,310 encounter new ones and so those are the 330 00:14:58,390 --> 00:14:55,630 ones that are now where focus should be 331 00:15:02,080 --> 00:14:58,400 directed if you want to develop that as 332 00:15:08,260 --> 00:15:06,910 I think it were we return hon yeah so 333 00:15:10,910 --> 00:15:08,270 for the sake of staying on schedule 334 00:15:12,030 --> 00:15:10,920 Arne yes